|
The Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference 2001: §25c
Home
Papers/Indices
prev (§25b)
Next (§26a)
| | Paper (refereed) Student-Faculty Papers
| | Recommended Citation: Simis, P and I Hoong. A Comparison of Using CBT and Teaching Assistants to Teach Microsoft Office 2000. In The Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference 2001, v 18 (Cincinnati): §25c.
|
| ![CDpic]("../../art/2009cdS.jpg") |
A Comparison of Using CBT and Teaching Assistants to Teach Microsoft Office 2000
Refereed
| | Peter Simis [a1] [a2]
The Sid Craig School of Business
California State University Fresno [u1] [u2]
Fresno, California, USA [c1] [c2]
Ivan Hoong [a1] [a2]
The Sid Craig School of Business
California State University Fresno [u1] [u2]
Fresno, California, USA [c1] [c2]
|
An experiment was conducted during the spring 2001 semester to determine the effectiveness of using a computer-based training (CBT) package to cover the basic concepts of Microsoft Office 2000. Two sections were conducted using CBT and 14 sections were conducted using a traditional lecture/lab format. The students in both groups were given the same tests using an on-line assessment package. No significant differences were found between the two delivery methods.
Keywords: CBT, computer-based training, Microsoft Office 2000
Read this refereed paper in Adobe Portable Document (PDF) format. (81 K bytes)
Preview this refereed paper in Plain Text (TXT) format. (9 K bytes)
Comments and corrections to
webmaster@isedj.org