The Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference 2005: §3162 Home Papers/Indices prev (§3154) Next (§3163)

Sat, Oct 8, 8:30 - 8:55, House A Paper (refereed)

Recommended Citation: Ury, G, M McDonald, G McDonald, and B Dorn. Student Performance Online vs Onground: A Statistical Analysis of IS Courses. In The Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference 2005, v 22 (Columbus OH): §3162. ISSN: 1542-7382. (A later version appears in Information Systems Education Journal 4(98). ISSN: 1545-679X.)

Student Performance Online vs Onground: A Statistical Analysis of IS Courses

Refereed

7 pages

Gary Ury    [a1] [a2]
Department of Computer Science and Information Systems
Northwest Missouri State University    [u1] [u2]
Maryville, Missouri, USA    [c1] [c2]

Merry McDonald    [a1] [a2]
Computer Science/Information Systems
Northwest Missouri State University    [u1] [u2]
Maryville, Missouri, USA    [c1] [c2]

Gary McDonald    [a1] [a2]
Computer Science/Information Systems
Northwest Missouri State University    [u1] [u2]
Maryville, Missouri, USA    [c1] [c2]

Brian Dorn    [a1] [a2]
College of Computing
Georgia Institute of Technology    [u1] [u2]
Atlanta, Georgia, USA    [c1] [c2]

In previous papers, the authors reported results of smaller-scale studies. The purpose of this study is to combine and expand those individual smaller scaled studies, to determine if significant differences exist between student performance in online and traditional classroom environments. The study includes more than 1300 observations spread across seven courses that are part of the computer science and information systems curriculum at Northwest Missouri State University. Student performance was compared by grade point average, ACT composite scores, number of credit hours completed, instructor, and delivery method. The only significant difference found was between student performance and delivery method in three high volume courses that serve multiple majors and minors. Online students in these three courses obtained a significantly lower average grade than onground students. In four other courses that service upper-level computer science majors no significant differences in performance were found. The varied results of the study could be a simple statement of fact. Different courses in different programs might have different performance results. It could be concluded that online students are simply satisfied with a little lower grade in particular courses or that traditional students perform better because of the availability of added resources planned and implemented for online curriculum. It could be concluded that faculty continue to deal with problems in effectively transferring traditional classroom learning to the online environment. It could also be speculated that the difference is any combination of the above conclusions.

Keywords: online learning, distance learning, course delivery methodology

Read this refereed paper in Adobe Portable Document (PDF) format. (7 pages, 328 K bytes)
Preview this refereed paper in Plain Text (TXT) format. (22 K bytes)

CDpic
Comments and corrections to
webmaster@isedj.org